Miliband and the Royal Academy
My great friend, former Foreign Office grandee and Russian expert, George Walden, predicted the Russians would pull out of the Royal Academy Exhibition. Why? Because last Saturday David Miliband, our strange-looking Foreign Secretary, made a rooky diplomatic error - he muddled two separate issues. On his blog he wrote`;
'Many people are looking forward to the Russian Masterpieces exhibition coming to London next year. Rightly. But what on earth can the Russians think will be achieved by forcing the closure of British Council offices outside Moscow? It is illegal (against the 1963 Vienna Agreement), hurts Russians, and damages Russia's image abroad. There is even a debate about whether the Russian measures are MORE restrictive than those against the British Council in Burma and Iran. I hope the government will think again before January 1st.'
Okay, Dave, listen carefully. If the RA show doesn't go ahead, it's your fault. The linkage made in your blog amounted to a deliberate challenge to the Russians and, though Putin may be Time's Person of the Year, we all know this is a gangster government. If you put one of a gangster's buddies in hospital, he'll put one of yours in the morgue. The trick is to outwit the gangster by not letting him make linkages. In this case you did it for him and also inspired headlines that suggested we might pull out of the exhibition. And, Dave, while we are on the subject, does it make sense for a Foreign Secretary to have a blog? A blog suggests you are going to go beyond the official line. But, as this case shows, you can't. And one final question, Dave. Are you or are you not a member of the most jejune and incompetent British administration of modern times?

12 Comments:
At December 20, 2007 11:17 AM,
philip walling said…
It's hard to believe it, but T Blair looks like a statesman compared to this lot.
At December 20, 2007 11:22 AM,
elberry said…
i was gripped last night by the certainty that the Russians will nuke us. This will probably happen within 10 years.
At December 20, 2007 11:32 AM,
Recusant said…
Elberry, does that count as a happy certainty for you?
And Philip, John Major looks like a statesman compared to this lot.
At December 20, 2007 11:54 AM,
ian russell said…
back on form, Mr. A.
but he looks more like someone who must keep a blog than he does a gov. dept. In fact, why isn't there a minister for blogs?!
At December 20, 2007 12:06 PM,
Bryan Appleyard said…
How long have I been off form, Ian?
At December 20, 2007 12:13 PM,
ian russell said…
don't worry about it, no one's noticed.
ha ha, it cracks me up; His first career ambition was to be a bus conductor. I mean, even it was true why would anyone admit to it?
of course, does that makes Gordon Blakey?
At December 20, 2007 12:44 PM,
steveb said…
That's a nice word. I can use for the next couple of years and really get to know it well. Naive, simplistic and superficial all rolled into one.
Wasn't Guido going on about Miliband's blog sometime this year and how much it cost?
At December 20, 2007 1:12 PM,
elberry said…
Obviously a nuclear holocaust would be pretty good news. i'm just hoping it doesn't happen at some inconvenient moment in my life, but then i suppose one can't choose these things.
At December 20, 2007 1:45 PM,
Rebel with Cause said…
Lucky than his blog is not that popular! Even Jim Murphy, Europe Minister has a higher PageRank on his blog.
At December 20, 2007 1:49 PM,
Spongebob said…
What was wrong with John Major? He left the economy and public finances in good shape. The amount he wasted on the ERM exit was like spitting on a red hot shovel next to Northern Rock, the Dome and NHS IT systems. He also kept out Kinnock. My last vivid of him memory was cautioning against the intervention in Iraq - in retrospect these were wise words. Everyone had it in for him. Was it the cones hotline or something? He wasn't at all bad in my book. Compared to Brown, he is a cross between Konrad Adenauer and Harry S Truman.
At December 20, 2007 4:05 PM,
Recusant said…
Spongebob, there is much wisdom in what you say. I take back my harsh words regarding John Major and substitute Charlie Haughey instead.
At December 20, 2007 11:00 PM,
philip walling said…
Now Haughey, Recusant, there's a name to conjure with.
But Major is a thoroughly decent man who tried to do his best. Whereas Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Campbell, Levy, Milliband et al - decent? honourable? worthy of respect? Don't make me laugh!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
back to blog home