Star Trek: The Franchise Becomes a Myth
Last night I saw Star Trek. I teared up at the first shot of the Enterprise, at the appearance of Leonard Nimoy, at the inevitable shot of Enterprise emerging unscathed from some cosmic fireball, at the enthusiastic walk-on crew member we all knew must die in the next two minutes, even at the ponderous moralising. Basically, I saw the entire thing through a haze of moisture. Why? Because this movie marks the moment when the franchise became a myth. Until now, Star Trek has been fun in a post-modern, ironic kind of way. Even under the command of the super-solemn Jean-Luc Picard, the show seemed cuddly, a familiar joke told over and over again. Galaxy Quest was a brilliant spoof, but it was hardly necessary, Trek spoofed itself. But J.J.Abrams - plainly an ego of Borg Cube proportions judging by his gigantic name spread across the screen at the start of the closing credits - has cut through the accretions of exhausted irony and started all over again. He has done so - I will not spoil the plot - with a device that allows an almost infinity of sequels. As with all good myths, the story is freed to be told again. Abrams has started a new Star Trek wave. Now there will always be new Star Trek waves. Like Peter Pan or Superman, the Trek myth is established across the generations. Abrams treats it with innocence and respect in the certain knowledge that he is handling meanings and imagery that preceded him and will outlast him. It's an American thing, this triumphant naivete emerging from chaos and cynicism, this sanctification of story. Or, if you prefer, it's a blast.

10 Comments:
At May 12, 2009 7:43 AM,
Sophie King said…
You are not the first bloke I have come across to have this extraordinary teary reaction - it seems to afflict those in their fifties particularly. The film left me utterly unmoved. Does this mean I am part-Vulcan? As a buddy movie set on a ship I would rate Master and Commander far higher.
At May 12, 2009 8:31 AM,
ian russell said…
...I would rate Captain Pugwash far higher. But then I'm such a simple soul.
At May 12, 2009 8:44 AM,
Sophie King said…
Ha ha yes! Pugwash too, Ian.
At May 12, 2009 10:37 AM,
flowers said…
I love your website, seriously. I read it daily via my Greader
flowers
At May 12, 2009 11:46 AM,
Gordon McCabe said…
Warning: Oblique Plot Spoiler below.
That plot device is a bit disturbing from a meta-cinematic perspective, because it will allow Hollywood to explore the parallel worlds of all their jaded franchises. George Lucas, for example, could start filming another set of Star Wars films based upon the premise that Luke Skywalker travels back in time to prevent Anakin Skywalker becoming Darth Vader.
At May 12, 2009 12:03 PM,
Susan B. said…
The only Star Trek movie I liked was the one where they come back to earth. I think it had whales.
At May 12, 2009 4:51 PM,
newpsalmanazar said…
Collective, multi-generational storytelling. Is this how the Greeks got started? Hmmm, I'll have to ponder the implications a while.
At May 12, 2009 5:00 PM,
Sean said…
Trekies should be shot, either that or given a new nappy.
Babylon 5 has it all, Order vs. chaos; authoritarianism vs. free will
its all there.
At May 12, 2009 5:16 PM,
jonathan law said…
The Onion is on fine form here:
http://www.theonion.com/content/video
/trekkies_bash_new_star_trek_film
At May 12, 2009 5:20 PM,
malty said…
Whatever next, Obstmetre, a critique on The Bill ?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
back to blog home